Movimentos Reciprocantes no Preparo Químico Mecânico de Canais Radiculares
Resumo
A endodontia é uma especialidade de extrema importância para a odontologia e é composta por diversos passos, entre eles a fase de instrumentação dos canais radiculares. O preparo químico mecânico tem como funções a limpeza, a desinfecção e modelagem do canal radicular, para que este possa receber o material obturador. Com o propósito de alcançar essas funções, a instrumentação dos canais radiculares através do uso de uma única lima em movimento recíproco vem se popularizando devido à redução do tempo de trabalho, diminuído o estresse do profissional e do paciente e menor tendência de fraturas dos instrumentos. Entretanto, antes de escolher o sistema que vai utilizar, o cirurgião dentista deve conhecer as capacidades e limitações de um deles. A proposta desse trabalho é descrever por meio de uma revisão de literatura dois tipos de sistemas de limas únicas: Reciproc® e WaveOne®, identificando suas principais características e importância na prática clínica. Palavras-Chave: Tratamento endodôntico; Movimentos reciprocantes; Reciproc e Wave one.Referências
ARIAS A, PEREZ-HIGUERAS JJ, MACORRA JC. Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance at apical and coronal levels
of Reciproc and WaveOne new files. J Endod. 2012; 38(9): 1244-8.
BAUGH D, WALLACE J. The role of apical instrumentation in root canal treatment: a review of the literature. J
Endod. 2005; 31(5): 333-340.
BAUMAN MA. Nickel-titanium: options and challenges. Dent Clin N Am. 2004; 48: 55–67.
BERUTTI E, CHIANDUSSI G, PAOLINO DS, SCOTTI N, CANTATORE G, CASTELLUCCI A et al. Canal shaping with
WaveOne Primary reciprocating files and ProTaper System: a comparative study. J Endod. 2012; 38(4): 505-509.
BÜRKLEIN S, HINSCHITZA K, DAMMASCHKE T, SCHÄFER E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two
single file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and
ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 449-461.
BÜRKLEIN S, SCHÄFER E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-files and full-sequence rotary instrumentation
systems. J Endod. 2012; 38: 850- 852.
BYSTRÖM A, SUNDQVIST G. Bacteriological evaluation of the eficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation
in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res. 1981; 89: 321–328.
CASTELLÓ-ESCRIVÁ R, ALEGRE-DOMINGO T, FAUS-MATOSES V, ROMÁN- RICHON S, FAUS-LIÁCER VJ. In
vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper, WaveOne and Twisted Files. J Endod. 2012; 38(11):
1521-1524 .
DAGNA A, ARCIOLA CR, VISAI L, SELAN L, COLOMBO M, BIANCHI S et al. Antibacterial efficacy of conventional
and single-use Ni-Ti endodontic instruments: an in vitro microbiological evaluation. Int J Artif Organs. 2012;
35(10): 826-31.
DE DEUS G. Endodontia. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi; 1992.
DE DEUS G, MOREIRA EJL, LOPES HP, ELIAS CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in
reciprocating movement. Int Endod J. 2010; 43(12): 1063-8.
DE-DEUS G, BRANDÃO MC, BARINO B, DI GIORGI K, FIDEL RA, LUNA AS. Assessment of apically extruded
debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110(3): 390-4.
Ciência Atual | Rio de Janeiro | Volume 10, Nº 2 • 2017 | inseer.ibict.br/cafsj | Pg. 13-16
DE-DEUS G, ARRUDA TEP, SOUZA EM, NEVES A, MAGALHÃES K, THUANNE E et al. The ability of the Reciproc
R25 instrument to reach the full root canal working length without a glide path. International Endodontic Journal.
2013; 46(10): 993-8.
FARIA AG, ROCHA RG, PEREZ FEG. Análise do índice e ângulo do desvio apical através de técnica de instrumentação
manual e automatizada, realizada por alunos de graduação em Odontologia da Universidade Federal
do Pará e do Centro Universitário do Pará. Revista de Odontologia da Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. 2006;
18(3): 211-17.
FERRAZ CC, GOMES NV, GOMES BP, ZAIA AA, TEIXEIRA FB, SOUZA-FILHO FJ. Apical extrusion of debris and
irrigants using two hand and three enginedriven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J. 2001; 34: 354–8.
FRANCO V, FABIANI C, TASCHIERI S, MALENTACCA A, BORTOLIN M, DEL FABBRO M. Investigation on the
shaping ability of Nickel-Titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion. J Endod. 2011; 37(10): 1398-1401.
GAMBARINI G, RUBINI AG, AL SUDANI D, GERGI R, CULLA A, DE ANGELIS F et al. Influence of different angles
of Reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of Nickel- Titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2012; 38(10): 1408-
11.
GAVINI G, CALDEIRA CL, AKISUE E, CANDEIRO GT, KAWAKAMI DA. Resistance to flexural fatigue of Reciproc
R25 files under continuous rotation and reciprocating movement. J Endod. 2012; 38: 684-7.
GENERALI L, RIGHI E, TODESCA MV, CONSOLO U. Canal shaping with WaveOne reciprocating files: influence
of operator experience on instrument breakage and canal preparation time. Odontology. 2014; 102(2): 217-22.
HIZATUGU, R et al. Endodontia em sessão única: Mito ou realidade? A técnica do tratamento Endodôntico em
sessão única. São Paulo: Editora Atheneu, p. 23-58, 2002.
HÜBSCHER W, BARBABOW F, PETERS O. A Root-canal preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by
micro-computed tomography. Int. Endod. J. 2003; 36(11): 740-47
KANDASWAMY D, VENKATESHBABU N, PORKODI I, PRADEEP G. Canal- centering ability: An endodontic challenge.
J Conserv Dent. 2009; 12(1): 3-9.
KAZEMI RB, STENMAN E, SPANGBERG LS. Machining efficiency and wear resistance of nickeltitanium endodontic
files. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996; 8: 596–602.
KIM HC, KWAK SW, CHEUNG GS, KO DH, CHUNG SM, LEE W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two
new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod. 2012; 38(4):
541-4.
KUHN WG, CARNES DL JR, CLEMENT DJ, WALKER WA 3RD. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless
steel files on root canal preparation. J Endod. 1997; 23(12): 735–8.
LEORNARDO MR, LEONARDO RT. Sistemas Rotatórios em Endodontia: Instrumentos de Níquel-titânio. São
Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2002.p. 315.
LIMONGI O, RAMOS IFA, TROIAN CH, VANNI JR, ALBUQUERQUE DS, BARATTO FF. Análise, in vitro, do desvio
apical, observado no sentido proximal, produzido por dois sistemas de rotação alternada. J. bras. endodontia.
2004; 5(16): 67-72.
LIMONGI O. Análise comparativa, in vitro, por meio de tomografia computadorizada, do preparo do canal radicular,
empregando-se a técnica manual e automatizada de movimento oscilatório e giro contínuo [dissertação].
Camaragibe: UPE; 2005.
Ciência Atual | Rio de Janeiro | Volume 10, Nº 2 • 2017 | inseer.ibict.br/cafsj | Pg. 14-16
LIMONGI O, IRALA LED, SILVA KT, SALLES AA, GONZATT JM. Verificação da trajetória angular percorrida por
três peças automatizadas de movimento oscilatório. Stomatos. 2008; 14(27): 36-43.
LIMONGI O, BERNARDES AV, NETTO PRS, MELO TAF, SOARES RG. Análise do desgaste produzido no preparo
de canais radiculares com o sistema oscilatório em três diferentes velocidades. Revista de Odontologia da Universidade
Cidade de São Paulo. 2009; 21(1): 14-7. LOPES HP, SIQUEIRA JF. Endodontia, Biologia e Técnica. Guanabara:
Rio de Janeiro; 2004. p. 374.
ÖZOK AR, PERSOON IF, HUSE SM, KEIJSER BJF, WESSELINK PR, CRIELAARD W et al. Ecology of the microbiome
of the infected root canal system: A comparison between apical and coronal root segments. Int Endod J. 2012;
45: 530-541.
PAQUÉ F, ZEHNDER M, DE DEUS G. Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating Single-File F2 ProTaper
technique versus rotary full sequence. J Endod. 2011; 37(10): 1394-97.
PARASHOS P, MESSER HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod. 2006; 32(11): 1031-
43.
PÉCORA JD, CAPELLI A. Shock of paradigms on the instrumentation of curved root canals. Braz.
Dent. J. 2006; 7(1): 3-5.
PETERS OV, LAIB A, GÖHRING TN, BARBAKOW F. Changes in root canal geometryafter preparation assessed by
high-resolution computed tomography. J. Endod. 2001; 27(1): 1-6.
PETERS AO, SCHÖNENBERGER K, LAIB A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry
assessed by micro computed tomography. Int. Endod. J. 2011; 34(3): 221-30.
PETTIETTE MT, DELANO EO, TROPE M. Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students
with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files. J Endod. 2001; 27: 124–7.
PEDULLÀ E, GRANDE NM, PLOTINO G, PALERMO F, GAMBARINI G, RAPISARDA E. Cyclic fatigue resistance of
two reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments after immersion in sodium hypochlorite. Int Endod J. 2013; 46(2):
155-9.
PLOTINO G, GRANDE NM, TESTARELLI L, GAMBARINI G. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating
instruments. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 614-18.
PLOTINO G, GIANSIRACUSA RUBINI A, GRANDE NM, TESTARELLI L, GAMBARINI G. Cutting effi- ciency of
Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. J Endod. 2014; 40(1): 228-30.
PLOTINO G, GRANDE NM, PORCIANI PF. Deformation and fracture incidence of Reciproc instruments: a clinical
evaluation. J Endod. 2015; 48(2): 199-205.
REDDY SA, HICKS ML. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques. J
Endod. 1998; 24: 180–3.
ROANE JB, SABALA CL, DUNCANSON MG. The “balanced-force” concept for instrumentation of curved canals.
J Endod. 1985; 11(5): 203-11.
ROBINSON JP, LUMLEY PJ, COOPER PR, GROVER LM, WALMSLEY AD. Reciprocating root canal technique
induces greater debris accumulation than a continuous rotary technique as assessed by 3-dimensional microcomputed
tomography. J Endod. 2013; 39(8): 1067-70.
RUDDLE CJ. Cleaning and shaping root canal systems. Caminhos da Polpa, 8ª ed., Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. St.
Louis: Mosby, 2011; 231-291.
Ciência Atual | Rio de Janeiro | Volume 10, Nº 2 • 2017 | inseer.ibict.br/cafsj | Pg. 15-16
SCHÄFER E, BÜRKLEIN S. Impact of nickel-titanium instrumentation of the root canal on clinical outcomes: a
focused review. Odontology. 2012; 100(2): 130- 136.
SCHILDER H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974; 18: 269-96.
SCHMIDT WPL, HÉLIO PL, ELIAS CN, VIEIRA MVB, BATISTA MMD, CUNHA RS. Resistance to
bending and buckling of WaveOne and Reciproc instruments. ENDO. 2014; 8: 153-6.
SELTZER S, NAIDORF IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985; 11: 472-478.
SETZER FC, KWON TK, KARABUCAK B. Comparison of apical transportation between two rotary file systems and
two hybrid rotary instrumentation sequences. J Endod. 2010; 36(7): 1226-1229.
SHEN Y, COIL JM, MCLEAN AG, HEMERLING DL, HAAPASALO M. Defects in nickel- titanium instruments after
clinical use. Part 5: Single use from endodontic specialty practices. J Endod. 2009; 35(10): 1363-1367.
SHEN Y, ZHOU HM, ZHENG YF, PENG B, HAAPASALO M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical
treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013; 39: 163-72.
SOARES JÁ, CESAR EAS. Avaliação clínica e radiográfica do tratamento endodôntico em sessão única de dentes
com lesões periapicais crônicas. Pesqui. Odontol. Bras. 2001; 15(2): 138-44.
VARELA-PATIÑO P, IBAÑEZ-PÁRRAGA A, RIVAS-MUNDIÑA B, CANTATORE G, OTERO XL, MARTIN-BIEDMA
B. Alternating versus continuous rotation: A comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod. 2010;
36(1): 157-159.
Versiani MA. Avaliação do preparo biomecânico e da obturaçãode canais radiculares ovais promovidos pelos sistemas
de instrumento único WaveOne, Reciproc e SAF [tese]. Ribeirão Preto: USP; 2012.
WALIA HM, BRANTLEY WA, GERSTEIN H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of
Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988; 14: 346–51.
WAN J, RASIMICK BJ, MUSIKANT BL, DEUTSCH AS. A comparasion of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating
and rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Aust Endod J. 2011; 37: 122-127.
WEBBER J, MACHTOU P, PERTOT W, KUTTLER S, RUDDLE CJ, WEST JD. The WaveOne single-file reciprocating
system. Roots. 2011; 1: 28-33.
WEINE FS, KELLY RF, LIO PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen
shape. J. Endod. 1975; 1(18): 255-262.
YARED G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J. 2008;
41: 339-344.
YARED G, RAMLI GA. Single file reciprocation: A literature review. ENDO. 2013; 7(3): 171-8.
YE J, GAO Y. Metallurgical characterization of M-Wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic
rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue. J Endod. 2012; 38: 105-7.
YOUNG-JUN L, SU-JUNG P, HYEON-CHEOL K, KYUNG-SAN M. Comparison of the centering ability of Wave•One
and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals. Restor Dent Endod. 2013; 38(1): 21-25
of Reciproc and WaveOne new files. J Endod. 2012; 38(9): 1244-8.
BAUGH D, WALLACE J. The role of apical instrumentation in root canal treatment: a review of the literature. J
Endod. 2005; 31(5): 333-340.
BAUMAN MA. Nickel-titanium: options and challenges. Dent Clin N Am. 2004; 48: 55–67.
BERUTTI E, CHIANDUSSI G, PAOLINO DS, SCOTTI N, CANTATORE G, CASTELLUCCI A et al. Canal shaping with
WaveOne Primary reciprocating files and ProTaper System: a comparative study. J Endod. 2012; 38(4): 505-509.
BÜRKLEIN S, HINSCHITZA K, DAMMASCHKE T, SCHÄFER E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two
single file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and
ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 449-461.
BÜRKLEIN S, SCHÄFER E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-files and full-sequence rotary instrumentation
systems. J Endod. 2012; 38: 850- 852.
BYSTRÖM A, SUNDQVIST G. Bacteriological evaluation of the eficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation
in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res. 1981; 89: 321–328.
CASTELLÓ-ESCRIVÁ R, ALEGRE-DOMINGO T, FAUS-MATOSES V, ROMÁN- RICHON S, FAUS-LIÁCER VJ. In
vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper, WaveOne and Twisted Files. J Endod. 2012; 38(11):
1521-1524 .
DAGNA A, ARCIOLA CR, VISAI L, SELAN L, COLOMBO M, BIANCHI S et al. Antibacterial efficacy of conventional
and single-use Ni-Ti endodontic instruments: an in vitro microbiological evaluation. Int J Artif Organs. 2012;
35(10): 826-31.
DE DEUS G. Endodontia. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi; 1992.
DE DEUS G, MOREIRA EJL, LOPES HP, ELIAS CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in
reciprocating movement. Int Endod J. 2010; 43(12): 1063-8.
DE-DEUS G, BRANDÃO MC, BARINO B, DI GIORGI K, FIDEL RA, LUNA AS. Assessment of apically extruded
debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110(3): 390-4.
Ciência Atual | Rio de Janeiro | Volume 10, Nº 2 • 2017 | inseer.ibict.br/cafsj | Pg. 13-16
DE-DEUS G, ARRUDA TEP, SOUZA EM, NEVES A, MAGALHÃES K, THUANNE E et al. The ability of the Reciproc
R25 instrument to reach the full root canal working length without a glide path. International Endodontic Journal.
2013; 46(10): 993-8.
FARIA AG, ROCHA RG, PEREZ FEG. Análise do índice e ângulo do desvio apical através de técnica de instrumentação
manual e automatizada, realizada por alunos de graduação em Odontologia da Universidade Federal
do Pará e do Centro Universitário do Pará. Revista de Odontologia da Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. 2006;
18(3): 211-17.
FERRAZ CC, GOMES NV, GOMES BP, ZAIA AA, TEIXEIRA FB, SOUZA-FILHO FJ. Apical extrusion of debris and
irrigants using two hand and three enginedriven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J. 2001; 34: 354–8.
FRANCO V, FABIANI C, TASCHIERI S, MALENTACCA A, BORTOLIN M, DEL FABBRO M. Investigation on the
shaping ability of Nickel-Titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion. J Endod. 2011; 37(10): 1398-1401.
GAMBARINI G, RUBINI AG, AL SUDANI D, GERGI R, CULLA A, DE ANGELIS F et al. Influence of different angles
of Reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of Nickel- Titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2012; 38(10): 1408-
11.
GAVINI G, CALDEIRA CL, AKISUE E, CANDEIRO GT, KAWAKAMI DA. Resistance to flexural fatigue of Reciproc
R25 files under continuous rotation and reciprocating movement. J Endod. 2012; 38: 684-7.
GENERALI L, RIGHI E, TODESCA MV, CONSOLO U. Canal shaping with WaveOne reciprocating files: influence
of operator experience on instrument breakage and canal preparation time. Odontology. 2014; 102(2): 217-22.
HIZATUGU, R et al. Endodontia em sessão única: Mito ou realidade? A técnica do tratamento Endodôntico em
sessão única. São Paulo: Editora Atheneu, p. 23-58, 2002.
HÜBSCHER W, BARBABOW F, PETERS O. A Root-canal preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by
micro-computed tomography. Int. Endod. J. 2003; 36(11): 740-47
KANDASWAMY D, VENKATESHBABU N, PORKODI I, PRADEEP G. Canal- centering ability: An endodontic challenge.
J Conserv Dent. 2009; 12(1): 3-9.
KAZEMI RB, STENMAN E, SPANGBERG LS. Machining efficiency and wear resistance of nickeltitanium endodontic
files. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996; 8: 596–602.
KIM HC, KWAK SW, CHEUNG GS, KO DH, CHUNG SM, LEE W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two
new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod. 2012; 38(4):
541-4.
KUHN WG, CARNES DL JR, CLEMENT DJ, WALKER WA 3RD. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless
steel files on root canal preparation. J Endod. 1997; 23(12): 735–8.
LEORNARDO MR, LEONARDO RT. Sistemas Rotatórios em Endodontia: Instrumentos de Níquel-titânio. São
Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2002.p. 315.
LIMONGI O, RAMOS IFA, TROIAN CH, VANNI JR, ALBUQUERQUE DS, BARATTO FF. Análise, in vitro, do desvio
apical, observado no sentido proximal, produzido por dois sistemas de rotação alternada. J. bras. endodontia.
2004; 5(16): 67-72.
LIMONGI O. Análise comparativa, in vitro, por meio de tomografia computadorizada, do preparo do canal radicular,
empregando-se a técnica manual e automatizada de movimento oscilatório e giro contínuo [dissertação].
Camaragibe: UPE; 2005.
Ciência Atual | Rio de Janeiro | Volume 10, Nº 2 • 2017 | inseer.ibict.br/cafsj | Pg. 14-16
LIMONGI O, IRALA LED, SILVA KT, SALLES AA, GONZATT JM. Verificação da trajetória angular percorrida por
três peças automatizadas de movimento oscilatório. Stomatos. 2008; 14(27): 36-43.
LIMONGI O, BERNARDES AV, NETTO PRS, MELO TAF, SOARES RG. Análise do desgaste produzido no preparo
de canais radiculares com o sistema oscilatório em três diferentes velocidades. Revista de Odontologia da Universidade
Cidade de São Paulo. 2009; 21(1): 14-7. LOPES HP, SIQUEIRA JF. Endodontia, Biologia e Técnica. Guanabara:
Rio de Janeiro; 2004. p. 374.
ÖZOK AR, PERSOON IF, HUSE SM, KEIJSER BJF, WESSELINK PR, CRIELAARD W et al. Ecology of the microbiome
of the infected root canal system: A comparison between apical and coronal root segments. Int Endod J. 2012;
45: 530-541.
PAQUÉ F, ZEHNDER M, DE DEUS G. Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating Single-File F2 ProTaper
technique versus rotary full sequence. J Endod. 2011; 37(10): 1394-97.
PARASHOS P, MESSER HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod. 2006; 32(11): 1031-
43.
PÉCORA JD, CAPELLI A. Shock of paradigms on the instrumentation of curved root canals. Braz.
Dent. J. 2006; 7(1): 3-5.
PETERS OV, LAIB A, GÖHRING TN, BARBAKOW F. Changes in root canal geometryafter preparation assessed by
high-resolution computed tomography. J. Endod. 2001; 27(1): 1-6.
PETERS AO, SCHÖNENBERGER K, LAIB A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry
assessed by micro computed tomography. Int. Endod. J. 2011; 34(3): 221-30.
PETTIETTE MT, DELANO EO, TROPE M. Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students
with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files. J Endod. 2001; 27: 124–7.
PEDULLÀ E, GRANDE NM, PLOTINO G, PALERMO F, GAMBARINI G, RAPISARDA E. Cyclic fatigue resistance of
two reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments after immersion in sodium hypochlorite. Int Endod J. 2013; 46(2):
155-9.
PLOTINO G, GRANDE NM, TESTARELLI L, GAMBARINI G. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating
instruments. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 614-18.
PLOTINO G, GIANSIRACUSA RUBINI A, GRANDE NM, TESTARELLI L, GAMBARINI G. Cutting effi- ciency of
Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. J Endod. 2014; 40(1): 228-30.
PLOTINO G, GRANDE NM, PORCIANI PF. Deformation and fracture incidence of Reciproc instruments: a clinical
evaluation. J Endod. 2015; 48(2): 199-205.
REDDY SA, HICKS ML. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques. J
Endod. 1998; 24: 180–3.
ROANE JB, SABALA CL, DUNCANSON MG. The “balanced-force” concept for instrumentation of curved canals.
J Endod. 1985; 11(5): 203-11.
ROBINSON JP, LUMLEY PJ, COOPER PR, GROVER LM, WALMSLEY AD. Reciprocating root canal technique
induces greater debris accumulation than a continuous rotary technique as assessed by 3-dimensional microcomputed
tomography. J Endod. 2013; 39(8): 1067-70.
RUDDLE CJ. Cleaning and shaping root canal systems. Caminhos da Polpa, 8ª ed., Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. St.
Louis: Mosby, 2011; 231-291.
Ciência Atual | Rio de Janeiro | Volume 10, Nº 2 • 2017 | inseer.ibict.br/cafsj | Pg. 15-16
SCHÄFER E, BÜRKLEIN S. Impact of nickel-titanium instrumentation of the root canal on clinical outcomes: a
focused review. Odontology. 2012; 100(2): 130- 136.
SCHILDER H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974; 18: 269-96.
SCHMIDT WPL, HÉLIO PL, ELIAS CN, VIEIRA MVB, BATISTA MMD, CUNHA RS. Resistance to
bending and buckling of WaveOne and Reciproc instruments. ENDO. 2014; 8: 153-6.
SELTZER S, NAIDORF IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985; 11: 472-478.
SETZER FC, KWON TK, KARABUCAK B. Comparison of apical transportation between two rotary file systems and
two hybrid rotary instrumentation sequences. J Endod. 2010; 36(7): 1226-1229.
SHEN Y, COIL JM, MCLEAN AG, HEMERLING DL, HAAPASALO M. Defects in nickel- titanium instruments after
clinical use. Part 5: Single use from endodontic specialty practices. J Endod. 2009; 35(10): 1363-1367.
SHEN Y, ZHOU HM, ZHENG YF, PENG B, HAAPASALO M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical
treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013; 39: 163-72.
SOARES JÁ, CESAR EAS. Avaliação clínica e radiográfica do tratamento endodôntico em sessão única de dentes
com lesões periapicais crônicas. Pesqui. Odontol. Bras. 2001; 15(2): 138-44.
VARELA-PATIÑO P, IBAÑEZ-PÁRRAGA A, RIVAS-MUNDIÑA B, CANTATORE G, OTERO XL, MARTIN-BIEDMA
B. Alternating versus continuous rotation: A comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod. 2010;
36(1): 157-159.
Versiani MA. Avaliação do preparo biomecânico e da obturaçãode canais radiculares ovais promovidos pelos sistemas
de instrumento único WaveOne, Reciproc e SAF [tese]. Ribeirão Preto: USP; 2012.
WALIA HM, BRANTLEY WA, GERSTEIN H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of
Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988; 14: 346–51.
WAN J, RASIMICK BJ, MUSIKANT BL, DEUTSCH AS. A comparasion of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating
and rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Aust Endod J. 2011; 37: 122-127.
WEBBER J, MACHTOU P, PERTOT W, KUTTLER S, RUDDLE CJ, WEST JD. The WaveOne single-file reciprocating
system. Roots. 2011; 1: 28-33.
WEINE FS, KELLY RF, LIO PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen
shape. J. Endod. 1975; 1(18): 255-262.
YARED G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J. 2008;
41: 339-344.
YARED G, RAMLI GA. Single file reciprocation: A literature review. ENDO. 2013; 7(3): 171-8.
YE J, GAO Y. Metallurgical characterization of M-Wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic
rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue. J Endod. 2012; 38: 105-7.
YOUNG-JUN L, SU-JUNG P, HYEON-CHEOL K, KYUNG-SAN M. Comparison of the centering ability of Wave•One
and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals. Restor Dent Endod. 2013; 38(1): 21-25
Downloads
Arquivos adicionais
Publicado
03-11-2017
Edição
Seção
Artigos
Licença
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
